Examiner Aaron D Ho has allowed 222 of 286 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Aaron D Ho maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 316 total applications, 222 were allowed and 64 were abandoned, resulting in 286 disposed applications. The allowance rate stands at 78% of those decided applications. The examiner's work spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled figure represents the aggregate of all applications decided within that art unit over the period covered by this record.
A pooled record aggregates all applications across an examiner's assigned art units into one profile. The allowance rate reflects historical dispositions—applications already allowed or abandoned—and is calculated as a percentage of decided applications only, excluding pending cases. This aggregate figure describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of how any individual application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 167 decided applications with an interview and 119 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aaron D Ho has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 316 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP