Examiner Aaron J Browne has allowed 17 of 25 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Aaron J Browne maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 25 disposed applications, he issued allowances in 17 cases, yielding an allowance rate of 68%. The remaining 8 applications were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates his record across both art units and reflects only decided matters; pending applications are excluded from the calculation.
This pooled record combines examination activity across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 68% allowance rate is a historical aggregate of all decided cases and does not describe any single application or predict outcomes in future filings. Aggregate statistics characterize past performance across a broad portfolio but do not indicate how any particular application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Based on 13 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Based on 12 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aaron J Browne has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 25 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP