Examiner Aaron J Lowenberger has allowed 96 of 202 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Aaron J Lowenberger maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 202 disposed applications, 96 were allowed and 106 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 48%. This rate reflects outcomes on applications that were decided; pending applications are excluded. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of examination activity within TC 2100. These figures describe the historical record and do not forecast outcomes on any specific pending application.
A pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across an examiner's art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes past outcomes, not future ones. The rate—here, 48% allowed of 202 decided applications—reflects historical disposition patterns and is correlational data. It cannot predict the outcome of any individual case or indicate how a specific application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 120 decided applications with an interview and 82 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aaron J Lowenberger has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 202 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP