Examiner Aaron N Strange has allowed 40 of 95 decided applications (42%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Aaron N Strange maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across his pooled record, 95 applications have been disposed. Of those disposed applications, 40 were allowed and 55 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 42%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to all decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units under which the examiner has authority. The allowance rate of 42% describes the examiner's historical record—the share of decided applications that resulted in allowance—and reflects past dispositions only. Pooled figures do not account for variations by art unit, technology, or application complexity, and they are not predictions of outcomes in individual cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 55 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aaron N Strange has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 95 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP