Examiner Aaron Patrick Gormley has allowed 3 of 8 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Aaron Patrick Gormley maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 47 total applications, 8 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 8 decided applications, 3 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 38%. The examiner's work spans 1 art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications in that unit and does not forecast results in any individual case.
This examiner's record is pooled across all assigned art units. The allowance rate (38%) describes the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and reflects historical outcomes only. Pooled figures aggregate different subject-matter areas and different prosecution histories. An aggregate allowance rate is a statistical summary of past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 47 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aaron Patrick Gormley has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 47 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP