LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ABDELMONIEM I ELAMIN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Abdelmoniem I Elamin

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 1,267 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2020
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Abdelmoniem I Elamin has allowed 1,139 of 1,267 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

90% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2116 · 89%AU 2115 · 93%AU 2182 · 85%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Abdelmoniem I Elamin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning three art units. Across 1,267 disposed applications, 1,139 were allowed, yielding a 90% allowance rate. The examiner's allowance rate ranges from 85% to 93% across these art units. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes from distinct subject areas within TC 2100 and reflects historical disposition data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines results from multiple art units into a single aggregate statistic. The 90% allowance rate reflects past dispositions across all three art units combined and describes what has occurred, not what will occur in any specific case. Individual art units may vary; detailed per-art-unit records appear separately. Aggregate figures are historical snapshots and do not predict outcomes for pending or future applications.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2116
885 APPS · 89% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

89% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 78%
DISPOSITION789 / 96 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION25.6 moart unit avg 24.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility52% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)77%
§103 — Obviousness20% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness12%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW100%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW89%+11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 867 without.

ART UNIT 2115
334 APPS · 93% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.

93% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 81%
DISPOSITION309 / 25 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.4 moart unit avg 25.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY30.5 moart unit avg 36.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility59% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)64%
§103 — Obviousness44% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness22%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW100%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW91%+9 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 292 without.

ART UNIT 2182
48 APPS · 85% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.

85% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION41 / 7 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.2 moart unit avg 24.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY35.6 moart unit avg 37.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Abdelmoniem I Elamin

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    Across 1,267 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100, the examiner allowed 1,139, for an allowance rate of 90%.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This examiner has a substantial record in three art units within TC 2100: 2115, 2116, and 2182.
  • Does the allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. Allowance rates range from 85% to 93% across the examiner's art units, reflecting differences in subject matter and application outcomes within TC 2100.
  • What does this pooled rate tell me about my application?
    The pooled rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual results depend on the merits of each case.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Abdelmoniem I Elamin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,267 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP