LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ABDULHAKIM NOBAHAR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Abdulhakim Nobahar

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 82 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Abdulhakim Nobahar has allowed 62 of 82 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

76% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Abdulhakim Nobahar maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 82 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 76%, comprising 62 allowed and 20 abandoned applications. The record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical allowance rate across decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application. Applicants review public examiner records as one data point among many in understanding prosecution history.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown reflects past decisions on applications that have been allowed or abandoned, excluding pending cases. This aggregate figure describes historical outcomes and is not a prediction of the result in any specific application. Pooled data provides context on an examiner's overall record; prosecution of individual applications depends on claim scope, prior art, and legal arguments presented.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
82 APPS · 76% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

76% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION62 / 20 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION34.2 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY50.9 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Abdulhakim Nobahar

  • What is Abdulhakim Nobahar's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 76% across 82 disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This record spans one art unit. The pooled figures represent the examiner's aggregated history across all assigned units.
  • What does the allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The allowance rate is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual prosecution depends on the claims, prior art, and arguments in your particular case.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 82 applications: 62 allowed and 20 abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Abdulhakim Nobahar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 82 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP