Examiner Abdullah Ahmed Daud

What the data says.

Abdullah Ahmed Daud maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 215 total applications, 172 have been disposed (decided). Of those decided applications, 96 were allowed and 76 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. The examiner operates within a single art unit (2164). This pooled record reflects outcomes across all decided cases in that art unit and does not predict results for any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates all decided applications within the examiner's art unit. The 56% allowance rate is calculated from disposed applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past record across the technology center and constitute historical data. Aggregate statistics do not predict the outcome of any individual application, nor do they account for case-specific factors, claim scope, or prosecution history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Abdullah Ahmed Daud

• 01What is Abdullah Ahmed Daud's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 56%, calculated from 96 allowed applications and 76 abandoned applications (172 total disposed) across the examiner's public record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The examiner operates in one art unit: 2164, within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
• 03Does this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The 56% rate is a historical aggregate of past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Actual results depend on claim language, prior art, and case-specific prosecution.
• 04What do 'disposed applications' mean in this record?

  Disposed applications are those that have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Pending applications are excluded from this count and from the allowance-rate calculation.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.