This examiner has a small public record (22applications), so we don't publish a record summary — small samples over-state patterns. The per-art-unit figures below are shown for completeness.
Examiner Abdullah Khaled Aboud maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning a single art unit. The examiner has processed 22 total applications. To date, 0 applications have been decided (allowed or abandoned), and 0 remain pending or abandoned without decision. Because no applications have been decided, an allowance rate cannot be calculated. The record reflects the examiner's work history in TC 2100 and is presented as factual history only.
This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's assigned art units in TC 2100. The figures shown—total applications, decided applications, and allowance rates—describe the examiner's historical record only. These figures are not predictions of outcomes on any individual application. An allowance rate is computed only when applications have been decided; a zero-decided count means no rate is available. Pooled data masks variation across individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 22 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Abdullah Khaled Aboud has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 22 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP