Examiner Abimbola Ayeni has allowed 18 of 53 decided applications (34%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Abimbola Ayeni's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 53 disposed applications in art unit 2179, the examiner allowed 18 applications and abandoned 35, yielding an allowance rate of 34% over the decided count. This represents a single art unit within TC 2100. The record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance rate calculation.
This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's decided applications across their assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate and disposal counts are historical summaries of past outcomes, not predictions about any specific application. Different art units may have different subject-matter contexts and statutory requirements. Pooled figures describe the examiner's aggregate record and do not forecast the result of any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Abimbola Ayeni has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP