This examiner has a small public record (24applications), so we don't publish a record summary — small samples over-state patterns. The per-art-unit figures below are shown for completeness.
Examiner Abrham Alehegn Tamiru maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's pooled record spans one art unit. As of the data collection date, 24 total applications appear in the record. Zero applications have been allowed, zero abandoned, and zero disposed. No allowance rate can be calculated because no applications have been decided. The record reflects the examiner's activity within TC 2100 but does not indicate the status or outcome of pending applications.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units in TC 2100. The aggregate figures describe the examiner's historical record and do not serve as a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Because no applications have been decided in the current dataset, no allowance rate is available. Pooled records provide context on the examiner's past activity but reflect only closed matters and do not forecast prosecution results for any individual filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 24 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Abrham Alehegn Tamiru has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP