Examiner Adam L Basehoar has allowed 51 of 136 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Adam L Basehoar's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 136 disposed applications, the examiner issued 51 allowances, for an overall allowance rate of 38%. The remaining 85 applications were abandoned. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record in decided cases and does not reflect pending applications or constitute a prediction for any individual case.
This pooled record aggregates data across one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 38% describes the examiner's past disposition of decided applications and reflects historical outcomes only. Pooled figures do not predict the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units within this technology center may have distinct examination patterns; per-art-unit records appear in a separate section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 51 decided applications with an interview and 85 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Adam L Basehoar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 136 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP