Examiner Adam Lee has allowed 768 of 877 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Adam Lee has a public record spanning 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 877 decided applications, he has allowed 768, yielding an overall allowance rate of 88%. The allowance rate ranges from 79% to 93% across these art units, reflecting variation in the record by subject matter and art-unit composition. This pooled figure aggregates his work across multiple art units and represents historical disposition data only.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates an examiner's decisions across multiple subject areas. The overall allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across art units (shown as a range) reflects differences in subject matter, applicant pools, and case complexity. Pooled figures are useful for understanding an examiner's broad record but do not apply uniformly to every art unit or application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 445 decided applications with an interview and 59 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 125 decided applications with an interview and 92 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Adam Lee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 936 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP