Examiner Adam M Queler has allowed 200 of 320 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Adam M Queler maintains a pooled allowance rate of 63% across 320 decided applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His record spans six art units: 2137, 2145, 2172, 2177, 2178, and 2179. Of 324 total applications, 200 were allowed and 120 abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 63% to 65% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates data across six separate art units within TC 2100. The figures describe the examiner's historical record and are correlational only—not predictions about any specific application. Allowance rates are calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Art-unit variation exists; individual art-unit rates are reported separately on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 104 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 81 without.
Based on 16 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Based on 13 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 7 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Adam M Queler has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 324 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP