LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ADNAN M MIRZA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Adnan M Mirza

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 52 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Adnan M Mirza has allowed 32 of 52 decided applications (62%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

62% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Adnan M Mirza maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 52 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 32 and abandoned 20, yielding an allowance rate of 62%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical dispositions and does not predict outcomes in any specific case. The figures are pooled across all art units in the examiner's record.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units, pooling allowances and abandonments into a single allowance rate. The 62% figure is a historical snapshot of decided applications and reflects past dispositions only. Pooled rates across multiple art units represent an overall pattern, not a prediction for any individual application, and do not account for variation by art unit, claim type, or applicant strategy.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2145
52 APPS · 62% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

62% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION32 / 20 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION38.9 moart unit avg 26.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY63.6 moart unit avg 45.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Adnan M Mirza

  • What is Examiner Mirza's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 62%, calculated from 32 allowed applications and 20 abandoned applications out of 52 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This record covers 1 art unit (Art Unit 2145) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does this allowance rate predict what will happen to my application?
    No. This rate is a historical aggregate of past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any specific application.
  • What is the examiner's volume of applications?
    The public record includes 52 disposed applications. This count excludes any pending or other undecided applications.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Adnan M Mirza has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 52 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP