Examiner Adrian Stoica has allowed 4 of 6 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Adrian Stoica maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 6 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 67%. The examiner's pooled record reflects 4 allowed applications and 2 abandoned applications from a total filing count of 49 applications. This allowance rate is calculated on decided applications only and does not include pending cases. The record presented here aggregates all activity across the examiner's assigned art units.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate and disposition counts describe historical outcomes on decided cases and are correlational data, not predictive. Aggregate figures do not forecast the outcome of any individual application. Different art units may exhibit different patterns; per-unit detail is available separately. Any interview or procedural activity correlations shown are observed data, not proof of causal effects on prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 49 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Adrian Stoica has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 49 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP