Examiner Ahamed I Nazar has allowed 221 of 402 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ahamed I Nazar maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 402 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 221 cases, yielding an allowance rate of 55%. The record reflects 181 abandoned applications. These figures represent decided cases only and do not include pending applications. The pooled allowance rate aggregates all examiner activity within the art unit and reflects historical prosecution outcomes.
This pooled record aggregates all applications within the examiner's assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate reflects a historical ratio of allowed to decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any individual case. Pooled figures mask variations in filing type, claim complexity, prior art, and amendment patterns. An aggregate rate describes past outcomes across a population of applications, not the outcome of any specific prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 206 decided applications with an interview and 196 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ahamed I Nazar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 438 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP