Examiner Ahmed M Abraham has allowed 87 of 141 decided applications (62%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ahmed M Abraham maintains a pooled allowance rate of 62% across 141 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His public record spans three art units: 2154, 2165, and 2166. Of the 141 decided applications, 87 were allowed and 54 were abandoned. The allowance rate across these art units ranges from 50% to 70%, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within TC 2100. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome across all three art units and does not predict the outcome of any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's activity across three separate art units within TC 2100. The 62% allowance rate is computed from all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across these units combined. Pooled figures describe past decisions and offer a statistical snapshot of the examiner's record; they are not predictions of outcomes in any specific case. Different art units may reflect different substantive areas and examination patterns, which the pooled rate does not isolate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 47 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 40 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ahmed M Abraham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 141 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP