Examiner Aimee J Li has allowed 321 of 426 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Aimee J Li maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 426 disposed applications, the overall allowance rate is 75%, reflecting 321 allowed and 105 abandoned applications. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 63% to 100%. This pooled figure aggregates work spanning art units 2137, 2183, and 2195 and describes the examiner's historical record without predicting outcomes in any individual case.
This page presents a pooled record aggregating three separate art units within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe historical data across multiple art units and are not predictions for specific applications. The range (63% to 100%) reflects variation among the individual art units but does not identify which rate belongs to which unit—that detail appears in the per-art-unit section. Pooled figures provide context on overall output but do not forecast any single prosecution outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 43 decided applications with an interview and 241 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 101 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Based on 14 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aimee J Li has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 432 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP