Examiner Ajith Jacob has allowed 672 of 792 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ajith Jacob's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 792 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 85%. This comprises 672 allowed applications and 120 abandoned applications. The total application count in the record is 816, which includes pending matters. The figures presented reflect the examiner's pooled historical record and do not constitute a prediction of outcomes for any specific application.
This record aggregates data from a single art unit in TC 2100. Pooled figures represent historical aggregate performance across all matters in that unit and reflect past dispositions only. An allowance rate describes the share of decided cases (allowed and abandoned combined) relative to total dispositions. Aggregate statistics do not predict the outcome of any individual application and do not account for variation in case complexity, prosecution history, or claim characteristics.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 198 decided applications with an interview and 594 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ajith Jacob has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 816 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP