Examiner Albert Li has allowed 77 of 83 decided applications (93%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Albert Li's public record covers Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning a single art unit. Across 83 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 93%. Of 101 total applications, 77 were allowed and 6 were abandoned. This pooled figure reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record is drawn from a single art unit within TC 2100.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units where an examiner works, presenting an overall allowance rate and application count. The figures describe the examiner's historical record and are correlational only—they are not predictive of outcomes in any specific application. When an examiner covers multiple art units, the aggregate rate may mask variation between units; per-art-unit detail appears separately on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 57 decided applications with an interview and 26 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Albert Li has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 101 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP