Examiner Alexander J Kosowski has allowed 227 of 287 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Alexander J Kosowski has a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 287 disposed applications, 227 were allowed and 60 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. The allowance rate across his art units ranges from 78% to 87%, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within this technology center.
A pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units into a single profile. The overall allowance rate of 79% describes the examiner's historical record across all decided applications in those units combined. This figure is a summary of past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range of rates across art units shows that allowance rates vary depending on the particular art unit examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 43 decided applications with an interview and 199 without.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alexander J Kosowski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 287 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP