Examiner Alexander J Yoon has allowed 139 of 235 decided applications (59%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Alexander J Yoon maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 265 total applications, 139 were allowed and 96 were abandoned, yielding 235 decided applications. The allowance rate over those decided applications is 59%. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects dispositions across all applications in that art unit over the period covered by public data.
This pooled record aggregates all applications handled by the examiner across their art unit(s). The allowance rate of 59% describes the historical share of decided applications that were allowed and represents the examiner's past record only. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes in any individual case. Different applications may proceed differently based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 137 decided applications with an interview and 98 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alexander J Yoon has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 265 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP