Examiner Alexander Khong has allowed 627 of 728 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Alexander Khong maintains a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 728 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 86%, reflecting 627 allowed and 101 abandoned applications. The allowance rate ranges from 78% to 93% across these art units, indicating variation in disposition patterns by art unit. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across multiple subject-matter areas within TC 2100 and describes historical performance only.
A pooled record combines outcomes from multiple art units into a single aggregate allowance rate. This figure describes past dispositions and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome. The range across art units shows that allowance rates differ by art unit; the aggregate masks this variation. Understanding both the pooled rate and the range helps contextualize the examiner's record across TC 2100.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 182 decided applications with an interview and 100 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 86 decided applications with an interview and 140 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 118 decided applications with an interview and 102 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alexander Khong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 752 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP