Examiner Alexander Nmn Vinnitsky has allowed 38 of 46 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Alexander Nmn Vinnitsky maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 46 disposed applications. Of those 46 decided applications, 38 were allowed and 8 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. This rate reflects outcomes across all applications in his record within TC 2100 and represents past dispositions only.
This record aggregates all applications decided by this examiner across his art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 83% describes what occurred in his past caseload and is not a prediction of outcome for any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation across specific art units and technology areas. Each application's prosecution is distinct.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Based on 46 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alexander Nmn Vinnitsky has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP