Examiner Alexandria Josephine Miller has allowed 5 of 29 decided applications (17%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Alexandria Josephine Miller's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 29 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 17%, reflecting 5 allowed applications. The examiner's overall caseload includes 74 total applications, with 24 abandonments recorded. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity within the technology center and describes the historical record of decided cases.
This record pools all decisions across the examiner's art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 17% is calculated from disposed (decided) applications only and does not include pending cases. Pooled figures describe past outcomes and are not predictions for any individual application. Different art units may have varying examination patterns, so aggregate data reflects combined activity across all units assigned to this examiner.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alexandria Josephine Miller has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 74 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP