LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ALEXANDRIA Y BROMELL
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Alexandria Y Bromell

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 679 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Alexandria Y Bromell has allowed 537 of 679 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

79% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2167 · 74%AU 2156 · 99%AU 2169 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Alexandria Y Bromell has a public record of 698 total applications across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 679 disposed applications, 537 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 79%. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 74% to 99%. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes from art units 2156, 2167, and 2169 and reflects historical decision data only, not a prediction of any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines statistics from multiple art units into a single aggregate. The overall allowance rate of 79% describes past dispositions across all three units and reflects the examiner's historical decision pattern in TC 2100. The range (74% to 99%) shows variation among individual art units. These figures are correlational summaries of closed applications and are not predictive of outcomes in any pending or future case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2167
535 APPS · 74% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

74% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION396 / 139 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.5 moart unit avg 24.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.1 moart unit avg 41.2 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility44% · art unit 43%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)79%
§103 — Obviousness53% · art unit 75%
§112 — Written description & definiteness16%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW79%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW72%+7 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 135 decided applications with an interview and 400 without.

ART UNIT 2156
161 APPS · 99% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

99% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 69%
DISPOSITION141 / 1 / 19allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.3 moart unit avg 20.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY27.6 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility53% · art unit 56%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)81%
§103 — Obviousness54% · art unit 84%
§112 — Written description & definiteness17%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW98%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW100%-2 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 58 decided applications with an interview and 84 without.

ART UNIT 2169
2 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION0 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.3 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY35 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Alexandria Y Bromell

  • What is Alexandria Y Bromell's overall allowance rate?
    79%, calculated from 537 allowed applications out of 679 disposed applications across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Three art units (2156, 2167, 2169) within TC 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across the examiner's art units?
    Allowance rates range from 74% to 99% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes by unit.
  • Does this pooled rate apply to my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alexandria Y Bromell has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 698 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP