Examiner Ali S Abyaneh has allowed 40 of 79 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ali S Abyaneh maintains a public record of 79 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 40 were allowed and 39 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 51%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, 2137. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all applications decided during the period covered by the public record and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.
This pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art units. The allowance rate of 51% describes historical outcomes on a closed set of applications and reflects past disposition patterns. Pooled figures do not account for variation within individual art units and are not predictions of outcomes for any future or pending application. They serve as a factual reference to the examiner's public record.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ali S Abyaneh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 79 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP