Examiner Alicia M Antoine has allowed 79 of 132 decided applications (60%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Alicia M Antoine maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 132 applications. Of those decided applications, 79 were allowed and 53 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 60%. This allowance rate reflects the examiner's overall record on applications that reached a final disposition. The data covers the examiner's pooled work across all assigned art units within TC 2100.
This record aggregates the examiner's performance across all art units within a single technology center. The allowance rate of 60% describes decided applications in the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation that may exist between art units and do not indicate how any individual case will be examined or decided. Historical aggregate rates reflect work already completed.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 94 decided applications with an interview and 38 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alicia M Antoine has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 132 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP