Examiner Alvaro Salim Laham Bauzo has allowed 4 of 8 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Alvaro Salim Laham Bauzo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 45 total applications, 8 applications have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 8 decided applications, 4 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 50%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit, 2146. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This examiner's figures are pooled across one art unit. The 50% allowance rate describes historical outcomes on 8 decided applications and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate statistics describe the past record and vary by application characteristics, prior art, and claim scope. A pooled record aggregates different art units' dispositions into a single figure; that figure is a snapshot of closed cases, not a forecast.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 45 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Alvaro Salim Laham Bauzo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 45 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP