Examiner Ameir Myers has allowed 75 of 95 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ameir Myers maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning a single art unit. Across 95 disposed applications, 75 were allowed and 20 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record covers applications examined within TC 2100 over the period tracked in the examiner's public file.
A pooled record aggregates all applications across an examiner's assigned art units, presenting an overall allowance rate. The 79% figure summarizes the past record but is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may have different allowance rates. Pooled statistics describe historical disposition and are correlational only—they do not indicate how any future application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ameir Myers has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 95 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP