LYNCH·LLP
Book a consultation →
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AMIR ELSAYED DARWISH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Amir Elsayed Darwish

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 9 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Amir Elsayed Darwish has allowed 4 of 9 decided applications (44%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

44% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2199 · 43%AU 2187 · 50%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Amir Elsayed Darwish maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. His pooled record covers 54 total applications, of which 9 have been disposed. Among those 9 decided applications, 4 were allowed and 5 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 44% over the disposed count. This rate reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition and excludes pending matters.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 44% describes past outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics across art units reflect broad patterns in the examiner's record but do not account for variations in prosecution history, claim scope, or other case-specific factors that may affect individual applications.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2199
52 APPS · 43% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.

43% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION3 / 4 / 45allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION33.7 moart unit avg 25.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY53.3 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility83% · art unit 48%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)44%
§103 — Obviousness95% · art unit 89%
§112 — Written description & definiteness37%
◈ ART UNIT 2187
2 APPS · 50% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

50% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION1 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION41.3 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.5 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility100% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)0%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness50%

Based on 2 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Amir Elsayed Darwish

  • What is the allowance rate for Amir Elsayed Darwish?
    The allowance rate is 44%, calculated from 4 allowed applications out of 9 disposed applications in the pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The public record spans 2 art units (2187 and 2199) within TC 2100.
  • Does this record cover all applications filed with this examiner?
    No. The allowance rate is calculated only from the 9 disposed applications. The record includes 54 total applications, of which 5 were abandoned; the remaining applications are still pending and are not included in the allowance rate calculation.
  • What does the pooled record tell me about my specific application?
    The pooled figures describe the examiner's past outcomes across different art units and application types. They are not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and do not account for individual claim scope, prior art, or prosecution history.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Amir Elsayed Darwish has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP