Examiner Amresh Singh has allowed 493 of 646 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Amresh Singh has a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 646 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 493 cases, yielding an overall allowance rate of 76%. This figure reflects decided applications only—allowed and abandoned—and does not include pending cases. The pooled record aggregates work across both art units and represents the examiner's historical disposition pattern in this technology center.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's work across multiple art units into a single allowance rate. This aggregate figure describes past dispositions and is a historical average, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The allowance rate of 76% represents 493 allowed applications among 646 total decided cases across both art units combined. Understanding this distinction helps contextualize what the figure does and does not convey about any individual prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 383 decided applications with an interview and 259 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Amresh Singh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 688 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP