Examiner Amy M Levy has allowed 260 of 465 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Amy M Levy's public record spans 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 465 disposed applications, 260 were allowed and 205 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. The allowance rate varies across her art units, ranging from 54% to 66%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate history in TC 2100 and describes her past record only.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, masking unit-specific variation. The overall allowance rate—56% here—is a historical summary across all units combined and is not a prediction for any particular application. The range (54% to 66%) shows that outcomes differ by art unit. Pooled figures describe past patterns; individual applications proceed under their own examination circumstances.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 230 decided applications with an interview and 174 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 20 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Amy M Levy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 465 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP