LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AMY NMN TRAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Amy Nmn Tran

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 31 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Amy Nmn Tran has allowed 11 of 31 decided applications (35%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

35% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Amy Nmn Tran maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 62 total applications, 31 have been disposed (decided). Of those 31 disposed applications, 11 were allowed and 20 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 35% over the decided count. An additional 20 applications remain abandoned in the record, and 11 remain pending. The allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications that reached final disposition and is not a prediction of any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Examiner Tran's record across one art unit in TC 2100. The allowance rate of 35% describes the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the examiner's past record. Pooled figures like this measure historical outcomes and do not predict the result of any individual application. Applicants review such data to understand an examiner's historical pattern; individual case facts, claim scope, and prosecution strategy remain independent variables.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2126
62 APPS · 35% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

35% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION11 / 20 / 31allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35.3 moart unit avg 29.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.9 moart unit avg 44.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility91% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)89%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness61%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Amy Nmn Tran

  • What is Examiner Tran's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 35%, calculated over 31 disposed (decided) applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does Examiner Tran work in?
    Examiner Tran's record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2126) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does this allowance rate mean for my application?
    The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination responses.
  • How many total applications are in this record?
    The record includes 62 total applications. Of these, 31 have been disposed (decided); 11 were allowed, 20 abandoned, and 11 remain pending.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Amy Nmn Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 62 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP