LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AMY P HOANG
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Amy P Hoang

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 236 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Amy P Hoang has allowed 168 of 236 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

71% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Amy P Hoang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 272 total applications, 236 applications have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Of those 236 decided applications, 168 were allowed and 68 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 71%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure describes the examiner's decided applications to date and does not forecast outcomes in any particular case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates decisions across all of the examiner's art units within TC 2100. The 71% allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the examiner's pooled historical record. Aggregate figures describe past disposition patterns and are not predictive of any individual application's outcome. Each application is examined on its own merits.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2143
272 APPS · 71% ALLOWANCE
71% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 52%
DISPOSITION168 / 68 / 36allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.2 moart unit avg 29.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39 moart unit avg 45.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility58% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)78%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 94%
§112 — Written description & definiteness61%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW21%+65 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 183 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Amy P Hoang

  • What is Amy P Hoang's allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 71%, based on 168 allowed applications among 236 total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned). This figure describes the examiner's pooled historical record and is not a prediction for any specific case.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Amy P Hoang works in one art unit (Art Unit 2143) within Technology Center 2100. This profile presents pooled data across that art unit.
  • What does the 71% allowance rate mean?
    Of the 236 applications decided by this examiner (allowed or abandoned, excluding pending), 71% were allowed. This is a historical aggregate and does not indicate the probability of allowance in any pending or future application.
  • Why are pending applications excluded from the allowance rate?
    The allowance rate counts only decided applications—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications have not yet received a final determination and cannot be included in a historical allowance calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Amy P Hoang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 272 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP