Examiner An-An Ngoc Nguyen has allowed 7 of 9 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
An-An Ngoc Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across the examiner's single art unit, 48 applications have been filed. Of 9 disposed applications (allowed and abandoned combined), 7 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 78%. This rate describes the examiner's past record on decided cases and does not characterize any pending application. The data reflects historical outcomes only.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units where the examiner works. The allowance rate of 78% is calculated from decided applications only—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled total.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 48 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner An-An Ngoc Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 48 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP