Examiner Andalib Ft Lodhi has allowed 275 of 387 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Andalib Ft Lodhi maintains a public record across 4 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 387 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 275 and abandoned 112, yielding an allowance rate of 71%. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 65% to 87%. This pooled figure aggregates decisions made in different art units and reflects the examiner's historical record without constituting a prediction for any individual application.
This pooled record combines data from multiple art units within TC 2100 into a single aggregate statistic. The 71% allowance rate describes past decisions on 387 closed applications and is not a prediction of outcomes on new filings. The range of 65% to 87% across art units shows variation within the examiner's broader portfolio. Aggregate figures describe historical patterns; individual application outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and other case-specific factors.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 86 decided applications with an interview and 151 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 23 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 46 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 35 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andalib Ft Lodhi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 387 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP