Examiner Andre Pierre Louis has allowed 625 of 868 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Andre Pierre Louis maintains a public record across four art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 868 disposed applications, 625 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 72%. The examiner's work spans art units 2123, 2127, 2146, and 2187. Allowance rates across these art units range from 63% to 83%, reflecting variation in the composition and outcomes of applications handled within each unit.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units in TC 2100. The 72% allowance rate describes past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any individual application. Because different art units handle different technologies and application volumes, the overall figure masks unit-level variation—shown here as a range of 63% to 83%. Pooled statistics describe historical performance; they are not forecasts for specific cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 88 decided applications with an interview and 326 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 68 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 101 decided applications with an interview and 66 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 86 decided applications with an interview and 70 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andre Pierre Louis has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 914 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP