Examiner Andrea C. Leggett has allowed 560 of 716 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Andrea C. Leggett maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 716 disposed applications, her allowance rate is 78%, calculated from 560 allowed and 156 abandoned applications. This rate reflects the pooled record across her art units. Allowance rates vary among the art units in her portfolio, ranging from 17% to 80% across these units. The breadth of her record spans multiple areas within TC 2100, though the aggregate figure represents all decided applications combined.
This pooled record aggregates allowance rates across multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall 78% figure describes historical outcomes across all decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific case. Individual art units may show different allowance rates; the range shown (17% to 80%) illustrates this variation. Pooled data provides context on past decisions but does not forecast the outcome of any particular application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 269 decided applications with an interview and 424 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andrea C. Leggett has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 758 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP