Examiner Andrew Angel Bracero has allowed 9 of 9 decided applications (100%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Andrew Angel Bracero maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 35 total applications, 9 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 9 decided applications, all 9 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 100% over the disposed count. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure describes the historical record and is not a prediction of the outcome of any particular application.
This pooled record aggregates data from one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 100% is calculated from 9 decided applications and reflects past dispositions. Pooled figures describe an examiner's historical record across all their assigned art units and are correlational snapshots—they do not forecast the result of any individual application or account for the specific claims, prior art, or circumstances of any pending case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 35 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andrew Angel Bracero has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 35 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP