Examiner Andrew Chung has allowed 108 of 230 decided applications (47%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Andrew Chung maintains a public record of 230 disposed applications across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 108 were allowed and 122 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 47%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record across both art units combined and reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.
This record aggregates data from multiple art units within TC 2100 and reflects past dispositions. The allowance rate of 47% describes what occurred on 230 completed applications across those units, not a projection for any individual case. Pooled figures mask variation between art units; detailed per-art-unit records appear in separate sections and may differ from this aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 136 decided applications with an interview and 93 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 1 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andrew Chung has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 230 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP