Examiner Andrew J Jung has allowed 98 of 158 decided applications (62%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Andrew J Jung maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 158 disposed applications, 98 were allowed, for an overall allowance rate of 62%. The allowance rate ranges from 59% to 84% across these art units. This pooled figure reflects the aggregate outcome across different subject areas within TC 2100 and does not represent performance on any single art unit or any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes from multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate (62% of decided applications) describes past dispositions across all units combined. Aggregate statistics do not predict outcomes in individual applications and do not indicate how any particular case will be examined or decided. Applicants may review per-art-unit data separately to see how outcomes vary by specific subject matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 112 decided applications with an interview and 27 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 28 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andrew J Jung has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 167 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP