Examiner Andrey Belousov has allowed 468 of 659 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Andrey Belousov has a public record spanning four art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 659 decided applications, his allowance rate is 71%, calculated from 468 allowed applications and 191 abandoned applications. The allowance rate varies across his art units, ranging from 35% to 92%. This pooled record aggregates his work across multiple areas of the technology center and represents historical data only.
A pooled record combines outcomes across multiple art units and reflects past dispositions. The aggregate allowance rate describes what occurred in decided cases but is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range (35% to 92%) indicates variation among individual art units; the pooled 71% is a weighted average. Examining the per-art-unit detail separately provides more precise information for a particular filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 132 decided applications with an interview and 215 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 76 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 40 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andrey Belousov has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 714 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP