LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ANDREY BELOUSOV
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Andrey Belousov

TECH CENTER 2100 · 4 ART UNITS · 659 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 4 ART UNITS

Examiner Andrey Belousov has allowed 468 of 659 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

71% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2145 · 79%AU 2141 · 62%AU 2172 · 92%AU 2174 · 35%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Andrey Belousov has a public record spanning four art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 659 decided applications, his allowance rate is 71%, calculated from 468 allowed applications and 191 abandoned applications. The allowance rate varies across his art units, ranging from 35% to 92%. This pooled record aggregates his work across multiple areas of the technology center and represents historical data only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines outcomes across multiple art units and reflects past dispositions. The aggregate allowance rate describes what occurred in decided cases but is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range (35% to 92%) indicates variation among individual art units; the pooled 71% is a weighted average. Examining the per-art-unit detail separately provides more precise information for a particular filing.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2145
347 APPS · 79% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

79% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION275 / 72 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.3 moart unit avg 26.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY35.5 moart unit avg 45.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility12% · art unit 42%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)71%
§103 — Obviousness81% · art unit 93%
§112 — Written description & definiteness29%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 132 decided applications with an interview and 215 without.

ART UNIT 2141
151 APPS · 62% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

62% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION93 / 58 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.8 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY60.8 moart unit avg 47.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility18% · art unit 49%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)70%
§103 — Obviousness85% · art unit 91%
§112 — Written description & definiteness28%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW76%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW47%+29 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 76 decided applications with an interview and 75 without.

ART UNIT 2172
131 APPS · 92% ALLOWANCE
92% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION70 / 6 / 55allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17.5 moart unit avg 24.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY28.2 moart unit avg 44.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility24% · art unit 42%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)75%
§103 — Obviousness82% · art unit 91%
§112 — Written description & definiteness25%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW100%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW85%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 40 without.

ART UNIT 2174
85 APPS · 35% ALLOWANCE
35% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION30 / 55 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION31.4 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY51.3 moart unit avg 42.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility0% · art unit 33%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)83%
§103 — Obviousness50% · art unit 89%
§112 — Written description & definiteness0%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW67%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW9%+58 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Andrey Belousov

  • What is Andrey Belousov's overall allowance rate?
    His pooled allowance rate is 71% across 659 decided applications (468 allowed, 191 abandoned) in Technology Center 2100.
  • How many art units does he work in?
    He has a record spanning four art units: 2141, 2145, 2172, and 2174.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across his art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 35% to 92% across his art units, indicating variation in outcomes by subject area within TC 2100.
  • Is the 71% allowance rate a prediction for my application?
    No. The pooled rate is historical data across decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Andrey Belousov has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 714 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP