Examiner Angel Javier Calle has allowed 140 of 200 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Angel Javier Calle maintains a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 200 disposed applications, he allowed 140, yielding a 70% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 69% to 81% across these art units. His record includes 60 abandoned applications. These figures describe the examiner's pooled historical performance and do not predict outcomes in any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates allowance rates from multiple art units within TC 2100, combining different areas of subject matter under a single profile. Aggregate figures describe past dispositions only—they are historical statistics, not predictions about how any single application will be examined. Individual art-unit records, where available separately, may show variation. Pooled data is useful for understanding an examiner's overall pattern but does not forecast the path of any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 29 decided applications with an interview and 150 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Angel Javier Calle has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 229 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP