LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ANGEL L CASIANO
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Angel L Casiano

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 60 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAR 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Angel L Casiano has allowed 41 of 60 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

68% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Angel L Casiano has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 60 disposed applications, 41 were allowed and 19 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 68%. This rate reflects decided applications only and does not include any pending matters. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure describes the examiner's historical record and is not predictive of outcomes in any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units in which they work. The allowance rate of 68% is calculated from all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the pooled data and describes past dispositions. Pooled figures do not account for variation across different art units or technology areas. Aggregate statistics describe historical outcomes, not predictions about specific applications or how any particular case will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2182
60 APPS · 68% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.

68% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION41 / 19 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION26.1 moart unit avg 24.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY40.9 moart unit avg 37.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Angel L Casiano

  • What is the overall allowance rate for this examiner?
    The allowance rate is 68%, calculated from 41 allowed applications out of 60 disposed applications in the pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This examiner's public record covers one art unit.
  • What does the allowance rate include?
    The allowance rate reflects only decided applications (allowed and abandoned). Pending applications are excluded from this calculation. The rate describes past outcomes and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • What technology areas does this examiner handle?
    The examiner works in Technology Center 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Angel L Casiano has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 60 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP