LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ANGELA MARIE WIDHALM DE RODRIG
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 40 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig has allowed 9 of 40 decided applications (23%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

23% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 40 disposed applications, 9 were allowed and 31 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 23% over the decided count. The examiner's work spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled figure describes her historical record across all applications decided in her assigned art unit and is not a prediction of the outcome of any particular application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates all applications decided across an examiner's assigned art units into one allowance-rate figure. The 23% rate reflects outcomes on 40 closed applications and describes what has occurred in the examiner's past record. Aggregate historical figures do not predict the fate of any specific pending application, which depends on the application's own merits, the examiner's review of the written record, and applicable law.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2152
40 APPS · 23% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

23% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 49%
DISPOSITION9 / 31 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.3 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.9 moart unit avg 42.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig

  • What is Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig's overall allowance rate?
    Her allowance rate is 23%, calculated from 9 allowed applications out of 40 disposed applications in her pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate tell me about my application?
    The pooled allowance rate (23% over 40 decided applications) describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 40 applications total: 9 allowed and 31 abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Angela Marie Widhalm De Rodrig has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 40 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP