Examiner Angie M Badawi has allowed 205 of 322 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Angie M Badawi maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 322 decided applications, the examiner issued 205 allowances, yielding a 64% allowance rate. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 56% to 71%. The record spans both art units 2172 and 2179 with a substantial body of work. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's overall disposal history and does not constitute a prediction for any future application.
A pooled examiner record aggregates statistics across multiple art units to create a composite profile of past dispositions. The overall allowance rate and the range across individual art units are historical measures only—they describe what occurred in closed applications and are not predictive of outcomes in any specific pending case. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled average.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 108 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 79 decided applications with an interview and 82 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Angie M Badawi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 351 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP