Examiner Anh Ly has allowed 983 of 1,143 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Anh Ly maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,143 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 983 and abandoned 160, yielding an 86% allowance rate. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes any pending matters. The pooled figure aggregates activity across both art units and describes the examiner's historical record without forecasting outcomes in any individual case.
A pooled record combines metrics across multiple art units into a single aggregate. The allowance rate presented here is a historical summary of all disposed applications within TC 2100 and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate figures describe past performance; individual cases may differ. The data encompasses two distinct art units, each potentially handling different technical subject areas within the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 561 decided applications with an interview and 565 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Anh Ly has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,143 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP