Examiner Anil N Kumar

What the data says.

Anil N Kumar maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 395 disposed applications, the examiner issued 221 allowances and recorded 174 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 56% over the decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2174). This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate outcome across all applications in the art unit during the period covered by this public record.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided across the examiner's art units. The allowance rate of 56% describes the historical share of allowed decisions among all disposed applications and does not forecast the outcome of any individual application. Pooled figures mask variation within art units and represent past record only. Understanding an aggregate rate requires context about application volume, art unit scope, and the specific claims and prior art relevant to any given filing.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Questions about Examiner Anil N Kumar

• 01What is Anil N Kumar's allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 56%, calculated over 395 disposed applications (221 allowed, 174 abandoned). This is a historical pooled figure and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit (2174) within TC 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate include and exclude?

  The 56% allowance rate is the share of allowed decisions among all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned). Pending applications are excluded. The rate does not predict outcomes for any new or pending filing.
• 04What technology areas does this examiner handle?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.